How do you verify that an uncensored model is uncensored?
3 points by protocontrol 1h ago 2 comments
What are unrelated cost of switching to Linux you know?
3 points by anonandwhistle 7h ago 5 comments
Volkswagen gates a new vehicle's full horsepower behind monthly subscription
37 taubek 42 8/18/2025, 6:40:07 PM dexerto.com ↗
Tesla market cap was so high that any other normal producer felt the pressure. Simply designing and delivering good cars won't do it, because then you aren't a service company. Investors want you to exploit the customers to the last drop financially. You should try to make the product a service, because products are so 20th century! You shouldn't stop there though, you should also exploit their data. Because that's where the money is, because how else would you get ad revenue.
This is not meant to be satirical btw. It's really what's going on. VW tried to build a tech company as Cariad, which imploded because it's an old school industrial production company. They keep trying to throw tech at it but they can't do it like Tesla. They can build good EVs if they wanted, but they can't focus because imvesters are pulling them to ten different directions. One day it's software stack, the other day it's zonal architecture. It's sad to see them die a painful death like this.
But do not accept it as a given now. The next best time to fight agains this is always now! Do not buys cars that are sold that way. If you have to buy a 'new' car, buy a used one that you can repair. Try to see this pattern in other products and avoid those too.
Talk about it with others while mentioning simple analogies like basfo did here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44944155
And please, do not think that 'the market' could solve this. Once 'the market' sees adoption, it will follow suit. Only regulation can help with these issues.
Nothing is lost until we give up and accept that.
ID3 and others are curious cars. People have so many problems and software issues that it is funny how they still sell some cars. Those cars are regular cars that they stripped the engine and put an electric motor. Then sell it. After sell loads of cars, they started thinking about software and how an electric car might be diferent.
Who remembers their CEO for many times to say that they were about to pass Tesla in sales? When they almost had no cars or sales. Poor man, without medication, it is very hard to say something with meaning or have a clue about reality.
But the summary of this is simple: extortion.
This is the same company that created illegal cars and sold them. Then they got caught. Then they were to become the best electric cars. Then we got to see the crap of ID3 up to ID7! Remember it got rain and broke?
Let's hope they close that thing. Not the sausages, those are good and they sell them more than cars.
Still, Audi could get their engines from Honda. Fixed!
I inherited an ID3 and while I can say the software and entertainment system in general isn't great I think it is a solid car. If you look at how the cars improved by variant and versions over the last 4 years then it is quite remarkable. Cheap plastic gone, charging DC now at 185 kw, you have GTX versions with more HP than anybody would need.
Going EV is life-or-death for all car manufacturers. Who with the exception of Toyota, Hyundai, Kia and VW is doing a good job of the old manufacturers?
Can they capture more value by selling their big, expensive thing as a service rather than in one big sale?
In 2010, everyone complained that Adobe was ripping their users off charging them every month for software which basically doesn’t change (which was and is correct). But since that move, their valuation is up 10x.
I’d much prefer to drive a car that doesn’t know much about me…but then again, I still use Adobe products every day.
I don't know if this is strictly true. Photoshop between 2010 and 2025 has substantially changed.
Also, in 2010, the Master Collection was $2600 ($3800 in today's dollars). And an upgrade was something like $800. In the long run users may pay a bit more, but I think it's fair to say that making the costs really easier to ingest does create a lot of growth in the same way that financing increases car sales.
https://www.motorauthority.com/news/1119711_chapter-closed-b...
I'm not a lawyer, but is this not a class action suit waiting to happen?
Official dealers won't service it or will keep resetting it...
And honestly, locking horsepower behind a paywall is more justifiable than some of the other features you have to unlock - like activating your own headlight features or climate control. They are literally installing the physical components into your car and charging you to activate them.
Those old cars can be repaired whereas most of the non-old cars are simply small circuits of chips with strange DRM.
Well, no more. Now Volkswagen is willing to sell you the big machine for the price of the small machine. And they are willing to gamble on taking a financial loss if you do not change your mind after all and don't make up for the difference. What a great company! Either that, or they are selling you the big version whether you want it or not, and then trying to double-dip. But they would never do that, that's just a crazy conspiracy theory. R-right?
This new approach, however, often means you need to pay to use something that has already been produced, with its functionality fully available, but locked unless you subscribe. In that case, they are not really providing a service, they’re just holding a feature hostage until you pay. That isn’t a service; it’s basically extortion. If the car were free, I could understand having to pay to unlock it. But needing a subscription just to use my own car at full capacity? That’s dystopian.
I can totally see a TV that refuses to turn on until you’ve paid Samsung, a fridge that stays locked until you cough up more money, or a toilet that only lets you flush twice a day.Unless, of course, you upgrade to premium.
Everything has a different price, it's absolutely insane how they decide it. If you want a subscription, it costs about the same for 2 years as it does to just purchase the license. But wait, do you want a permanently locked node license or a transportable license? The node locked one is a bit cheaper. Why? Because then you can't salvage your software from a broken unit and install it on a working one, silly.
They'd prefer you just subscribe to everything because then you'll pay less money than if you fully purchased a unit from a competitor.
And you have paid the whole production cost.
• (earliest I'm aware of) integrated circuit companies in the semiconductor industry typically have different versions of an IC using the same silicon but with different resistor fuses burned to lock out premium functionality.
• bikeshares are basically a hardware lockout model
• I've been in the off-grid pay-as-you-go industry (For markets like in India and sub-Saharan Africa) which is functionally dependent on the concept of locking out hardware until someone has paid for it. It would be easy to see premium subscription features slotting into this model. Without the lockout, the industry would be a tiny fraction of its current size, and would not be reaching the most struggling individuals who cannot provide for the up-front cost needed to get a product in hand in the first place.
I think what VW's doing sucks, _relative to my pre-existing norms_ and what _they and the rest of the auto industry_ ordinarily used to to offer. But I can see an industry being enabled by the same behavior too. These opportunities are obviously rife with the potential for abuse & dystopian consequences. It would be really nice if a set of norms was drawn up that many could ratify so that companies & brands could be held accountable to a certain code of behavior. 'this is allowed', 'that is not allowed' type of thing. I don't want the future to be a Cory Doctorow novel.
At that point, is it really "your" car?
As the dystopian slogan says: "You will own nothing, and be happy."
Hyundai wants loniq 5 customers to pay for cybersecurity patch in baffling move
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44928497
It was the general case in VAG cars going back as far as 2000 that the same engine hardware was sold with different software packages for different markets and trims essentially. The same trim made different performance figures in different emissions regimes too. Typically, you could take a car without the paid software boost into an official shop, pay a one time fee, and get that boosted software package.
The fix is to go to any "Performance Automotive" shop, or buy a dongle on the internet for $200 that lets you just flash whatever you want to the ECU, because VW ECUs are surprisingly "open" (compare the ECU situation that Toyota has, where ECU reflashes basically weren't a thing) and then you can run +40ish hp and kill your undersized turbo at 80k miles, or turn off the soundaktor, or add some weird regulatory quirk of rear lighting, to enable extra features that you didn't pay for like radar cruise control.
Sure, you can now pay $20 and only get that for a month, but how stupid do you have to be to do so compared to a one time $760 cost?