Ask HN: What "developer holy war" have you flip-flopped on?
9 points by meowface 19h ago 26 comments
Ask HN: How do you connect with other founders in your city?
5 points by leonagano 1d ago 2 comments
ADHD drug treatment and risk of negative events and outcomes
44 bookofjoe 63 8/15/2025, 2:27:44 PM bmj.com ↗
Through my attempts, I've been told they don't really do adult adhd diagnoses without documentation of issues as a kid. I was recommended Wellbutrin to deal with symptoms in 2017. Got onto adderall when I moved health insurance in 2021. Back to Kaiser in 2024, I was routed to the same psychiatrist who once again wouldn't budge on adderall and once again recommended Welbutrin.
I used an online clinic to get my assessment (which I understand isn't taken seriously) which is what she cited. I asked what aspect of the assessment documentation did she think left me unqualified and she cited marijuana use in 2016. I asked her how she squares the fact that I'm an adult professional that makes comparable money to her, I have experience using both wellbutrin and adderall and see the former doing nothing and the latter helping, there's hundreds of times more evidence for adderall efficacy vs the flakey data on wellbutrin... She responded with something like: "I believe in my heart of hearts that what I am doing is right".
I thought the entire situation was kind of insane. Further research into the person makes me think they're a bit of a loon.
However, I ended up being prescribed adderall by an MD in Psychiatry due to issues I was having with work which led to a suicide attempt a couple years back. It's been eight or so months now of taking it, and it's been immensely helpful, despite not having an official diagnosis. I'm extremely appreciative of that doctor.
I'm now on a PPO plan and have been using Vyvanse for over a year now. It's lead to a dramatic improvement in my quality of life. I grieved for the time and opportunities I had lost due to not having been diagnosed and treated in childhood.
HMOs have a lot of upsides, but Kaiser's behavioral healthcare is awful (at least in the DC Metro area) and there's not much recourse unless you want to/can afford to pay out of pocket.
There's so much cynicism about ADHD even existing, even among healthcare professionals. Any time on HN any mention of ADHD seems to invite a lot of cynicism as well. That, compounded with that one of the most effective treatments for it is something that pretty much everyone can see a positive effect from (stimulant medication), makes it really difficult to navigate.
I hope that you can find a better option because it seems like Kaiser is just very antagonistic towards ADHD.
The whole process became so burdensome I just gave up and now I self medicate with Nicotine pouches.
Not proud of it and probably not the best alternative but it helps me focus and keeps me out of the stress of the constant back and forth that healthcare providers put you through.
As if a neurodevelopmental disorder just magically vanishes when you hit age of majority.
It's pretty wild that despite it being a disorder that has been documented for hundreds of years, people still make the argument that people are just lying.
I don't really disagree with you but I wonder how the thwarted sense of "my body in the world" is so connected to ADHD while not being connected at all to executive functioning (which in my perception is what amphetamines help with).
I could be completely wrong, but hopefully that explains my take better. I'd be happy for someone to correct me.
> Drug treatment for ADHD was associated with beneficial effects in reducing the risks of suicidal behaviours, substance misuse, transport accidents, and criminality but not accidental injuries when considering first event rate. The risk reductions were more pronounced for recurrent events, with reduced rates for all five outcomes. This target trial emulation study using national register data provides evidence that is representative of patients in routine clinical settings.
For a few years being medicated for ADHD was a godsend. I was finally able to be more productive and focus on work, my career took off in a huge way, I've literally tripled my income since I started medication
Now I'm incredibly burned out, I've been having pretty severe memory problems, I'm on medical leave from my job to try and course correct a bit here. I don't think this is purely caused by the medication, I think it is stress related as well, but my doctor's only course of action right now is to reduce and re-evaluate my meds
On one hand, being medicated was incredible for me. It felt like it finally let me overcome my demons and be the person I wanted to be and always knew I was capable of being
On the other hand, if it led to my current situation it's probably one of the worst choices I could have ever made. I hate having massive holes in my memory like this, and being burned out this way is extremely difficult to bear
So... If you can balance things better than I could, it's still probably worth being medicated. I don't regret it I just wish it hadn't burned me out like this
I recommend giving up caffeine if you haven't done so. That alone had a much greater impact on my daily functioning than taking breaks from my medication. It took my body a week to recalibrate, but my mentality and my energy has been way more even throughout my days. The nice thing too is I can sometimes have caffeine when I feel like I can benefit from it and it actually has a positive effect rather than just keeping you barely at baseline for a few hours.
I too got (re)diagnosed in my 30s and prescribed Concerta. Rediagnosed because my mom then told me I'd been diagnosed as a child and she just never told me. Finding the right dose took some trial and error, and to be honest "the right dose" is something that will probably vary throughout my life based on how good my non-medication ADHD management is going. But for me it's been life-changing without burning me out, and it's been almost 7 years.
I also think even without the medication the diagnosis is worth it. It clarifies your life somewhat, if there are things you have struggled with that it explains.
My SO has severe ADHS from early childhood on and gets medicated (first ritalin, now elvanse). She is always stressed because she has a guilty conscience; she does more things every day than she has time for. She has sleeping problems.
It's such a fast-paced lifestyle that it quickly takes its toll, and it's not as if it gets better with age. Its very hard to maintain a healthy lifestyle while permanently being "all-in" into something.
[1]: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33322995/
what would be "excessive"? it seems mighty subjective
https://www.aafp.org/dam/AAFP/documents/patient_care/adhd_to...
What counts as poor?
• Loses and/or misplaces items needed to complete activities or tasks
Everyone does this, so what would be an appropriately ADHD amount?
• Sidetracked by external or unimportant stimuli
re: "unimportant" stimuli, what makes a stimulus "unimportant"?
• Forgets daily activities
Again, who remembers everything without forgetting? Subjective unless you make it objective
• Diminished attention span
Compared to who or what? And isnt intense focus a symptom of ADHD? So how can you have both a diminished and increased attention? Sounds like the person simply isnt interested in what you were telling them
• Lacks ability to complete schoolwork and other assignments or to follow instructions
How exactly do they "lack ability"? Unwillingness? Unable to comprehend the speech? Cannot actually do the sums theyve been asked to do?
• Avoids or is disinclined to begin homework or activities requiring concentration
Homework = boring? Id imagine thats the consensus viewpoint. And if the person avoids activities requiring concentration, how can they also be hyperactive?
• Fails to focus on details and/or makes thoughtless mistakes in schoolwork or assignments
For things they arent interested in, sure - but the same person would produce intensely detailed recreational works proving they are certainly able to "focus on details", just not when its boring. I dont see that as an illness
Thats just the first section. A lot of subjectivity
> Symptoms and/or behaviors that have persisted ≥ 6 months in ≥ 2 settings (e.g., school, home, church). Symptoms have negatively impacted academic, social, and/or occupational functioning. Inpatients aged < 17 years, ≥ 6 symptoms are necessary; in those aged ≥ 17 years, ≥ 5 symptoms are necessary.
Clearly these aren't saying "have they ever misplaced anything?" or "have they ever forgotten anything?". Sure, most people have had some of these things happen some of the time. Yeah, all kids find homework boring, but most kids are still able to do it. Most kids forget things, but aren't losing multiple coats every winter. Most people aren't experiencing these symptoms to such a degree that it significantly impacts their ability to function.
Like autism, the diagnostic criteria are almost exclusively framed in how other people are impacted or inconvenienced by it. Very little attention is paid to the experience of the person actually living with it.
I see it as a difference, but not necessarily a disorder. As someone with "severe" ADHD there are tons of things that I'm substantially better at than I would be if not for the condition.
I believe ADHD is "rising" because our culture has grown more homogenous in recent decades, resulting in people with ADHD attempting to adapt to environments that are designed for and run by people without ADHD.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attention_deficit_hyperactivit...
The conclusions of the study, copy-pasted from the abstract, were:
> Drug treatment for ADHD was associated with beneficial effects in reducing the risks of suicidal behaviours, substance misuse, transport accidents, and criminality but not accidental injuries when considering first event rate. The risk reductions were more pronounced for recurrent events, with reduced rates for all five outcomes. This target trial emulation study using national register data provides evidence that is representative of patients in routine clinical settings.
My question is this: if we assume ADHD does not exist, what is going on here?
Specifically, how do you explain so-called "ADHD" patients who were medicated having a statistically significant lower risk of suicidal behaviours, substance misuse, transport accidents, criminality, and recurrent accidental injuries than those who were not medicated?
Do you think non-"ADHD" individuals (i.e. who don't fit the current diagnostic criteria for this assumed fictional disorder) would also display a reduced risk of suicidality, accidents, etc. if they were to take methylphenidate on a daily basis?
I really don't understand this idea that people with ADHD didn't suffer in the past or that the problems we face would magically disappear if society was just organized a bit differently. Would it alleviate a lot of the pressure? Certainly, but it wouldn't do away with the problems. It's the same with autism.