Isn't it more appropriate to compare this to aider?
I prefer the command line tools to IDE integration, even though I don't feel like the contextual options are great. In other words, I don't always feel that I can see the changes fully. I like Claude Code's option to expand the result using ctrl-r, and I like the diffs it provides. But, it still feels like there is a way to get better than what I see inside Zed and what I see inside Claude and Aider.
Maybe an editor that can be controlled and modified on the fly using natural language?
QRY · 4h ago
That's an interesting idea! I struggle with the same issues you've mentioned, that space between the IDE integrated option and pure CLI. Your comment sparked an idea of using something like vim or similar where you can edit the config on the fly and reload it. I wonder how hard it would be to bolt a prompt interface to the front to have it build the editor for you?
It would likely quickly devolve into typical editor config bikeshedding, only AI powered? At least for me, maybe someone smarter could streamline it enough to be useful though!
xrd · 3h ago
I was hoping I would goad someone into doing it.
But, do it for emacs, ok? </joke>
Actually, I *do* prefer emacs.
margarina72 · 2h ago
aider has an emacs integration
WhyNotHugo · 1h ago
Being able to open the diff in vimdiff view (or your editor's equivalent) would be a neat approach. Not entirely sure how to actually implement that.
flowingfocus · 1h ago
specifically for working better with diffs, I can recommend tmux + lazygit with this keybinding for quickly opening a floating lazygit:
not only does it allow you to see the diffs, but you can directly discard changes you don't want, stage, commit, etc.
carraes · 58m ago
Damn, thanks, i have some floating panes on tmux but never thought about doing something like this lol
jeremy_k · 2h ago
Just wanted to say I had been happily plodding along using AI tools in Zed, which had worked pretty well but seeing the SST team was behind OpenCode I decided to finally give a terminal based agent a try. I was blown away, primarily by the feedback loops of say OpenCode writing new tests, running the test suite, seeing the tests errored and looping back start the whole process again. That looping does not happen in Zed!
It was the first time I felt like I could write up a large prompt, walk away from my laptop, and come back to a lot of work having been done. I've been super happy with the experience so far.
crgwbr · 1h ago
I’ve definitely had exactly that sort of looping work with Zed, as long as I tell it how to run the tests. Are you perhaps not using one of the “thinking” models?
thdxr · 3h ago
hey one of the authors here
we're a little over a month into development and have a lot on our roadmap
the cli is client/server model - the TUI is our initial focus but the goal is to build alternative frontends, mobile, web, desktop, etc
we think of our task as building a very good code review tool - you'll see more of that side in the following weeks
can answer any questions here
cchance · 49m ago
Would be cool if it could be an alternative frontend for gemini-cli, claude code, acli and the other tui's
jauntywundrkind · 6h ago
Could really use a comparison versus the seemingly de-facto terminal AI coding tool Aider. https://aider.chat/
ETA: The above link is at the bottom of the original submission's README. (https://github.com/sst/opencode) I posted it without context, and I have no opinion on the matter. Please read theli0nheart's comment below for an X rebuttal.
I’m the founder and CEO of Charm. There are claims circulating about OpenCode which are untrue, and I want to clarify what actually happened.
In April, Kujtim Hoxha built a project called TermAI—an agentic coding tool built on top of Charm’s open-source stack: Bubble Tea, Lip Gloss, Bubbles, and Glamour.
Two developers approached him offering UX help and promotion, and suggested renaming the project to OpenCode. One of them bought a domain and pointed it at the repo.
At the time, they explicitly assured Kujtim that the project and repo belonged entirely to him, and that he was free to walk away at any point.
We loved what Kujtim built and offered him a full-time role at Charm so he could continue developing the project with funding, infrastructure, and support. The others were informed and declined to match the offer.
I also mentioned that if the project moved to Charm, a rename might follow. No agreement was made.
Shortly after, they forked the repo, moved it into their company’s GitHub org, retained the OpenCode name, took over the AUR package, and redirected the domain they owned.
To clarify specific claims being circulated:
- No commit history was altered
- We re-registered AUR packages for continuity
- Comments were only removed if misleading or promotional
- The project is maintained transparently by its original creator
The original project, created by Kujtim, remains open source and active—with the full support of the team at Charm.
That’s the story. We’ll have more to share soon.
hengheng · 6h ago
> an agentic coding tool built on top of Charm’s open-source stack: Bubble Tea, Lip Gloss, Bubbles, and Glamour.
Okay I feel old now.
skeeter2020 · 28m ago
It's pretty funny to refer to your libraries for building a TUI as an "open-source stack". From the commonly accepted vision of a "stack" it's a pretty thin slice. It's like saying "my over-engineered component library is a stack because it involves 15 layers of abstraction!".
Neither of these companies are focused on LLMs or AI, they're both just using this as AI dust to sprinkle on top of their products.
esafak · 4h ago
Come on man, the BLBG stack is where it's at! What are you using, Github Copilot?!
Both are go based using charmbracelet's gui libraries. There's actually a note about the project you posted being developed under the charm repo now but it doesn't seem to be public. Maybe they are the same project?
scosman · 6h ago
OpenCode is great. A tier TUI. Basically an open Claude code.
rw_panic0_0 · 6h ago
the UI looks very great. Just tried it, it's a pity that it doesn't support permissions before executing write/edit commands. I'm a Goose user btw
thdxr · 3h ago
it's implemented in the backend, will expose in frontend soon
willahmad · 6h ago
UI looks really neat and pleasant to use. Does it create a todo list per prompt similar to Claude Code?
daliusd · 4h ago
I have tried it and it does.
Tepix · 5h ago
The name is already taken, openCode is a large important code repository in Europe.
I prefer the command line tools to IDE integration, even though I don't feel like the contextual options are great. In other words, I don't always feel that I can see the changes fully. I like Claude Code's option to expand the result using ctrl-r, and I like the diffs it provides. But, it still feels like there is a way to get better than what I see inside Zed and what I see inside Claude and Aider.
Maybe an editor that can be controlled and modified on the fly using natural language?
It would likely quickly devolve into typical editor config bikeshedding, only AI powered? At least for me, maybe someone smarter could streamline it enough to be useful though!
But, do it for emacs, ok? </joke>
Actually, I *do* prefer emacs.
bind-key C-g display-popup -E -d "#{pane_current_path}" -xC -yC -w 80% -h 75% "lazygit"
not only does it allow you to see the diffs, but you can directly discard changes you don't want, stage, commit, etc.
It was the first time I felt like I could write up a large prompt, walk away from my laptop, and come back to a lot of work having been done. I've been super happy with the experience so far.
we're a little over a month into development and have a lot on our roadmap
the cli is client/server model - the TUI is our initial focus but the goal is to build alternative frontends, mobile, web, desktop, etc
we think of our task as building a very good code review tool - you'll see more of that side in the following weeks
can answer any questions here
One other thing that would be neat to make more visible: what kind of prompts and tools are at the heart of this agent?
I found a bunch of tools here. Haven't found an overarching prompt yet. https://github.com/sst/opencode/tree/dev/packages/opencode/s...
but we're going to make all this very configurable next week
other than the focus on tui design, does this have any advantage over Claude Code, Aider, Gemini using the same model?
we're very focused on UX and less so on LLM performance. we use all the same system prompts/config as claude code
that said people do observe better performance because of out of the box LSP support - edit tools return errors and the LLM immediately fixes them
ETA: The above link is at the bottom of the original submission's README. (https://github.com/sst/opencode) I posted it without context, and I have no opinion on the matter. Please read theli0nheart's comment below for an X rebuttal.
--
I’m the founder and CEO of Charm. There are claims circulating about OpenCode which are untrue, and I want to clarify what actually happened.
In April, Kujtim Hoxha built a project called TermAI—an agentic coding tool built on top of Charm’s open-source stack: Bubble Tea, Lip Gloss, Bubbles, and Glamour.
Two developers approached him offering UX help and promotion, and suggested renaming the project to OpenCode. One of them bought a domain and pointed it at the repo.
At the time, they explicitly assured Kujtim that the project and repo belonged entirely to him, and that he was free to walk away at any point.
We loved what Kujtim built and offered him a full-time role at Charm so he could continue developing the project with funding, infrastructure, and support. The others were informed and declined to match the offer.
I also mentioned that if the project moved to Charm, a rename might follow. No agreement was made.
Shortly after, they forked the repo, moved it into their company’s GitHub org, retained the OpenCode name, took over the AUR package, and redirected the domain they owned.
To clarify specific claims being circulated:
- No commit history was altered
- We re-registered AUR packages for continuity
- Comments were only removed if misleading or promotional
- The project is maintained transparently by its original creator
The original project, created by Kujtim, remains open source and active—with the full support of the team at Charm.
That’s the story. We’ll have more to share soon.
Okay I feel old now.
Neither of these companies are focused on LLMs or AI, they're both just using this as AI dust to sprinkle on top of their products.
Seriously, though: Charm creates CLI tools, not coding agents: https://charm.sh/ https://github.com/orgs/charmbracelet/repositories
Also, https://github.com/kujtimiihoxha 's recent commits are in https://github.com/opencode-ai/opencode .
But what does https://sst.dev/ (org behind https://github.com/sst/opencode) have to do with either charm or opencode?? Like Charm, it has nothing to do with coding agents.
Not for me.