I just publish a paper solving quantum gravity

7 brunocalza 9 7/2/2025, 8:06:11 PM twitter.com ↗

Comments (9)

PaulHoule · 16h ago
Back in the 1980s Quantum Gravity looked like a holy grail, post-2000 it has become a highly competitive field with many theories and the problem is not that we need a conceptual breakthrough but rather we can't tell these theories apart experimentally.

I feel like a dolt for ever believing the classical theory of a black hole interior, I'm pretty sure a real black hole looks pretty different. I guess I could go in and take a look but the problem is I could not get out to tell y'all what I saw!

taylodl · 16h ago
I believe there is no interior of a black hole - because black holes never form. From the perspective of an object falling into a black hole, it hits an impenetrable wall of Hawking radiation and is forced out. From the perspective of a distant observer witnessing this, the object appears to "fall" pass the Schwarzschild radius because it's so red-shifted we simply can't see it. Then trillions of years later it's bounced out. Extreme time dilation causes extreme observations. As a bonus, we avoid this whole singularity business.
BMc2020 · 16h ago
Sorry, a single author paper means you could not find even one co-author to agree with you. That's why they tend to get ignored.
PaulHoule · 15h ago
I'm inclined to ignore anything that is posted on X. It was just as bad when it was left-wing nuts as it now when it is right-wing nuts.
BMc2020 · 15h ago
Call me old school, but he couldn't be bothered to put the past tense of publish either, published.
mika6996 · 16h ago
Does anybody really think this is a plausible theory?
verdverm · 14h ago
as much as I do when some single author posts they have proved P=NP
gus_massa · 10h ago
Also, this has not been published in a peer review journal. Not everything that is published in a peer review journal is true, but it's a minimal filter.
verdverm · 10h ago
One might say the peer review is a trust signal, and is one of the many signals used to evaluate scientific reaults