Ask HN: Selling software to company I work for as an employee
50 points by apohak 4d ago 52 comments
Ask HN: What's your favorite architect/editor pair with Aider?
14 points by 34679 20h ago 1 comments
Crypto Investor Charged with Kidnapping and Torturing Man for Weeks
70 jonas21 47 5/25/2025, 2:55:20 AM nytimes.com ↗
You could store passphrases in a hardware wallet in a bank vault in a small European country.
A little bit of irony here having to store your crypto related stuff at a bank to keep it safe.
I would have thought one of those libertarian seasteads or enclaves would be axiomatically the best place for such things?
Physical security for digital credentials is the main point here, that doesn't always imply a regular bank, many modern banks lack the bank vaults of yore in any case.
Tangentially, avoid showing up unannounced at grandparents house: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZZmFG07OVs
Personal and physical security for founders, operators, and investors
[0] https://a16zcrypto.com/posts/article/personal-physical-secur...
Maybe there should be a version for investors to stay safe from a16z also
My understanding: the rubberhose crypto-analysis, even if unsuccessful, will result in some major damage done. Determined attacker might try to apply it regardless of any online statements on the off chance that the statements are wrong.
The reality is, in the xkcd Rubberhose cryptanalysis scenario, being actually unable to give up the information is a MUCH WORSE situation to be be in than having a key to give up before they permanently maim/kill you. It might be better for a third party who benefits from the information remaining secret, but not for the person unable to divulge it.
But thinking you're safe because the attackers will read, understand, and believe your claims of uncompromisable cryptographic security is dangerously naive.
I still believe, which might indeed be naive, that this is the best way. It results in a failed mission lowering the risks for others and if applied for all theses services (again naive), in a general understanding.
Of course it's material to the story. It'd be conpletely artificial to pretend otherwise.
You mean the overhyped extremely niche technologies?
considering that the crypto investor was a man and assuming that the man acquired the wallet he was tortured for by investing in crypto.
You'll just have to use a sock fulla nickels now I guess ... :shrug: