Ask HN: Almost a thousand dollars for a 20 minute new patient visit?

10 throwaway052501 18 5/23/2025, 10:17:54 PM
I live in the Bay Area and have a high-deductible health plan. Recently, my primary care doctor left UCSF to become a concierge physician — tired of the bureaucracy and low pay despite managing thousands of patients annually.

I booked a new-patient visit with a UCSF physician. The appointment lasted about 20 minutes. A few weeks later, I got the bill: $867. I assumed it was a mistake, but after calling, I learned this was the correct charge for CPT code 99204 (new patient visit, 45–59 minutes). Insurance won’t cover it due to my deductible.

This feels absurd. I get that healthcare is broken, especially in tech-heavy cities like SF, but $867 for a routine visit is hard to justify.

Is anyone working on viable alternatives? Concierge models? Subscription care? Could this be a startup opportunity or is regulation the only fix? Curious how others are navigating this and whether there's a scalable path forward.

Comments (18)

deanmoriarty · 42m ago
In the Bay Area:

- A 10 min visit to a specialist office, where I was seen by a nurse practitioner who was able to refer me to an exam without involving the main physician, costed $800 (just the visit, not the followup exam), which also went through deductible.

- A routine colonoscopy came at $19k with bills that kept coming for the next 6-12 months from various parties. Consumed my deductible in one shot as the first bill came.

- A visit to the ER that lasted 10 mins with an XRay costed me $5k, also sent in tranches for the next 6 months, to the point where I thought I was victim of some scam (I wasn’t). Maxed my deductible as well.

I have a couple non-critical health concerns right now I’d like to consult a doctor about, but I won’t drop another huge deductible just for that.

I am a dual citizen from a European country with a high quality healthcare public system (but admittedly longer waits than the US ). I’m not eligible for it since I’m not a resident anymore (I will when/if I move back), but as I went visiting family I booked a private appointment with a well known cardiologist and he spent a good 50 minutes with me, for a total of EUR 100.

BobbyTables2 · 51m ago
New primary care doctor did the same to me recently.

Made me wait 30 minutes for a 60 minute new patient appointment (based on the billing code) when the actual time with them was 10-15 minutes (and spent discussing history).

They didn’t even possess an Otoscope for looking inside the ear.

Charged >$400 and still cost me over $250.

I’ve seen other specialists that charge $100 for a visit.

giantg2 · 2h ago
Can't speak for your location specifically, but some places in the US have cash only doctors charging low fees for routine/easy visits. Some urgent cares offer primary care similar to that too. My guess is it will still be more expensive where you are due to cost of living. Most insurers have cost estimator tools on their website that help you price compare providers, so that might be an option for you.
j4nek · 2h ago
by voting for trump, haven't americans actively decided against solidarity-based health insurance?
mickelsen · 16m ago
The US system is a special case that goes beyond partisan politics, framing it as a lack of solidarity misses the point.

The real issue is that healthcare in the US has no functioning market and no effective regulation: prices are arbitrary, patients only see costs after the fact (even if you insist cash on something simple, the itemized bill takes forever), and insurers mostly exist to extract value. Both major parties keep allowing this to exist.

In other countries (even those without single-payer systems) there’s at least transparency and accountability. You know what you owe upfront, and regulators monitor excessive price disparities. Differentiation is allowed, but it’s still regulated.

Do you really believe UHG's 6% profit margin? US Insurance is basically private equity draining cash through inflated bills, with providers and insurers passing the buck while fleecing patients.

AStonesThrow · 18m ago
I surmise that you are referring to "universal healthcare". The President does not get to choose a model of healthcare for the nation, so no, my vote was not cast against whatever you're talking about.

Here are a few aspects of the Affordable Care Act:

- In the before times, health insurance was strongly tied to American employers. Their group purchasing power made it affordable, and it is counted in the benefits package. A quitting employee, or a firing employer, would have the understanding that, barring COBRA and other mitigations, the separated employee would lose their group insurance benefit.

- Many hospital systems have offered financial assistance, and self-pay plans, to uninsured patients. Qualify for Medicaid/Medicare, or avail yourself of one of these plans.

- The Affordable Care Act is a tax on the uninsured. Purchase insurance with the tax, or pay the tax directly. "Uninsured" is now the worst situation to be in, financially.

- The ACA signaled to employers, "fire at will." If an employee needs to be fired then they can scoop up insurance on the marketplace. The employer no longer needs to worry about the separated employee's well-being.

- Meanwhile, the employees have received the message "quit all you want." If you can live without the salary then you can scoop up an ACA plan on the Marketplace. Your risk of crippling medical debt is thereby somewhat mitigated.

- Various groups have been setting up Health Sharing plans which affirm that the Health Insurance model is irreparably broken. A Christian Health Sharing Ministry is a mutual-aid fund where members pool their funds and then expenses are paid according to their needs, per the Book of Acts, and mostly conforming to quasi-insurance regulations.

We're all limping towards Universal Healthcare and Single-Payer Insurance. That's the eventual end-game for most pundits. It may go back and forth for a while. But nobody can deny that we're aiming to replicate models in the UK and Canada.

aynyc · 2h ago
The scalable way forward is to vote, and to get your friends and family to vote. Not just national, but local elections.
jelsisi · 2h ago
This is effectively what function health is trying to solve -> https://my.functionhealth.com/signup?code=JELSISI10&_saasqua...
giantg2 · 2h ago
That is not what function is trying to solve. Function is selling a semi annual blood testing for $500/yr for screening purposes.
ericzawo · 2h ago
"Is anyone working on viable alternatives?"

Have you tried calling your local representative?

subject4056 · 2h ago
At the end of the day, much like housing cannot be both affordable and a good investment, healthcare cannot be both affordable and a lucrative career. Avoid going to an MD if you can get the same care from someone else.
actionfromafar · 2h ago
So nothing can be done to fix the problem?
subject4056 · 2h ago
You could get healthcare from someone who doesn't have to go $100ks in debt first, and then expects to make more than you do. If no such person with that profile exists, then yeah you're stuck paying the rate of the system that trained and employs them.
bigyabai · 2h ago
Specific to the Bay Area, you could travel out a ways see a practitioner that isn't overbooked.
1oooqooq · 52m ago
most things have two codes. dr visit. dr visit extra expensive. blood work blood work extra expensive.

i kid you not. everyone in health care knows this. and a patient have no way of knowing.

if it goes to your plan, they just pay the cheap code and the provider doesn't even say anything. if it's on your copay only, the plan will not help you and will laugh at your face. and it's all legal.

AStonesThrow · 1h ago
Don't ever accept a provider's bill or invoice at face value. Did you communicate with your insurance carrier? Their major function is to negotiate those billed charges down to something reasonable.

My provider billed $411 for the same CPT. My insurance slashed it by 50%. My copay was $40. No deductible applied, due to the plan's provision for a PCP visit.

You'll need to ensure that your insurance did their job and issued an EOB. Once the insurance has ruled on it, then you can proceed to negotiate with your provider. If the provider directly sent you a balance bill and you've not heard from your insurance carrier, then you need to reach out to insurance, not your creditors.

The creditor will also have avenues you may pursue, such as financial assistance or self-pay plans. Some may not be available due to your insurance coverage. Some people fly without a parachute and rely on the self-pay. You'd be surprised how zero-sum that can be.

Most notices demanding payment are subtly deceptive, even from legitimate creditors. I always rely on the online billing portal, or a human being who can pull up my account over the phone. Always get the latest statement. Compare all the paperwork, because timing and wording always matter a lot, especially when they're wrong!

thuanao · 10m ago
Yes it’s broken. The solution is and has always been a comprehensive single-payer system combined with price controls.

Roosevelt tried to do it almost a century ago in 1935, but the moron greedy traitor racist fascist conservatives blocked it.

cjbenedikt · 2h ago
I experienced exactly the same only even more expensive: $1300! The US health care system has deeply entrenched players:care providers,insurers, hospitals, pharma industry. All make a lot of money from it. Several startups tried to tackle it. Even the combination of Amazon& Buffett &JPMorgan that set out to change it eventually caved. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/04/haven-the-amazon-berkshire-j... Hopeless case.